Preventing Change and Protecting the Regime: Crime Preventers, Local Livelihoods, and the 2016 Ugandan Elections
Loading...
Date
2016
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
JSRP Paper
Abstract
In Uganda's 2016 national election, international and national commentators raised questions about the role that the government’s Crime Preventer Programme would play. Many claimed that they would be used “as tools” to rig the elections, intimidate voters, and be manipulated into a voting block for the ruling NRM regime. Based on over 250 interviews and eight months of
ethnographic fieldwork between February 2014 and February 2016, this paper presents a study of the Crime Preventer Programme in Gulu District, examining how it developed from a seemingly innocuous community policing programme into a tool to recruit a valuable segment of the population that might otherwise have been a strong supporter of the Opposition. In particular, I ask why the government fostered a program that connected unemployed, marginalized and disenfranchised youth, who theoretically could have used their newfound organization to challenge the state, whether through votes or violence. I examine specific instances when Gulu District’s Crime Preventers were mobilized to support overtly political ends, such as altering the voter registration list and blocking movement of Opposition candidates. I use these anecdotes to analyse why youth participated while posing neither a threat to the government, nor inspiring a meaningful backlash from the Opposition. I find that—despite low and unpredictable rewards and high social and psychological cost of supporting a government that many Acholis find reprehensible—the high rate of participation in Crime Preventers and obedience to state authorities can be explained through the militarization of Uganda’s neo-patrimonial system and the concomitant securitization of livelihoods.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Tapscott, R. (2016). Preventing change and protecting the regime: Crime preventers, local livelihoods, and the 2016 Ugandan elections. JSRP Paper, 31.