The Context of Social Capital: A Comparison of Rural and Urban Entrepreneurs in Uganda

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Entrepreneurship theory and Practice

DOI

Abstract

Classical network theory states that social networks are a form of capital because they provide access to resources. In this article, we propose that network effects differ between collectivistic and individualistic contexts. In a collectivistic context, resource sharing will be “value based.” It is expected that members of a group support each other and share resources. In contrast, in an individualistic context, resource sharing will be more often based on reciprocity and trust. Hence, we hypothesized that networks will be more beneficial in individual contexts compared with collectivistic context. We found partial support for our hypotheses.

Description

Citation

Rooks, G., Klyver, K., & Sserwanga, A. (2016). The context of social capital: A comparison of rural and urban entrepreneurs in Uganda. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 40(1), 111-130. DOI: 10.1111/etap.12107

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By