Institutional framework in developing economies Do all dimensions matter for financial intermediation by microfinance deposit-taking institutions?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBongomin, George O. C.
dc.contributor.authorMalinga, Charles A.
dc.contributor.authorMunene, John C.
dc.contributor.authorNtayi, Joseph M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-26T07:39:16Z
dc.date.available2022-05-26T07:39:16Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to establish the relationship between institutional framework of regulative (formal rules), normative (informal norms) and cultural-cognitive (cognition), and their effects on financial intermediation by microfinance deposit taking institutions (MDIs) in developing economies like Uganda. Design/methodology/approach – Data collected from a total sample of 400 poor households and 40 relationship officers located in rural Uganda were processed using statistical package for social sciences and analysis of moment structures to establish the relationship between institutional framework of regulative, normative and cultural-cognitive, and their effects on financial intermediation by MDIs in developing economies. Findings – The results showed that the three dimensions of regulative (formal rules), normative (informal norms) and cultural-cognitive (cognition) significantly affect financial intermediation by MDIs in developing economies like Uganda. In addition, as a unique finding, two new dimensions of procedural and declarative cognition emerged from cultural-cognitive framework to determine financial intermediation among MDIs in developing economies, specifically in Uganda. Research limitations/implications – The study collected data from only poor households and relationship officers located in rural Uganda. It ignored peri-urban and urban areas in Uganda. In addition, the study focused only on MDIs and ignored other financial institutions. Besides, the study was purely quantitative, therefore, further research through interviews may be useful in future. Furthermore, the study was carried out in rural Uganda as a developing economy. Thus, future research using the same variables in other developing economies may be useful. Practical implications – Managers ofen_US
dc.identifier.citationBongomin, G. O. C., Malinga, C. A., Munene, J. C., & Ntayi, J. M. (2018). Institutional framework in developing economies: Do all dimensions matter for financial intermediation by microfinance deposit-taking institutions?. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JFRC-02-2017-0025/full/html
dc.identifier.urihttps://nru.uncst.go.ug/handle/123456789/3404
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Financial Regulation and Complianceen_US
dc.subjectStructural equation modelingen_US
dc.subjectDeveloping economiesen_US
dc.subjectFinancial intermediationen_US
dc.subjectInstitutional frameworken_US
dc.subjectMicrofinance deposit taking institutionsen_US
dc.subjectRules of the gameen_US
dc.titleInstitutional framework in developing economies Do all dimensions matter for financial intermediation by microfinance deposit-taking institutions?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Do all dimensions matter for financial.pdf
Size:
709.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Social Sciences