• Login
    View Item 
    •   NRU
    • Journal Publications
    • Medical and Health Sciences
    • Medical and Health Sciences
    • View Item
    •   NRU
    • Journal Publications
    • Medical and Health Sciences
    • Medical and Health Sciences
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Impact of Intervention Practices on Malaria Treatment Outcomes Among Patients in Bushenyi District, Uganda

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Article (768.3Kb)
    Date
    2021
    Author
    Nyabayo Maniga, Josephat
    Kalenzi Atuhaire, David
    Mugasa, Claire Mack
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Malaria remains a major vector borne disease causing both mortalities and morbidities in the world. Uganda as a country has currently scaled out major campaigns to reduce and eliminate the disease using different interventions. However, there is no clear data on the impact of such interventions on malaria treatment outcomes. Therefore, this study was aimed at assessing the impact of malaria intervention practices on Artemether- Lumefantrine (AL) treatment outcomes among the residents of Bushenyi district, Uganda, a high intensity malaria transmission area. Methods This was a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out among 184 study participants for a period of one year (August 2017 to August 2018) in four selected health centers in Bushenyi district, Uganda. The investigative methods used included a researcher administered questionnaire, laboratory and clinical evaluations of participants. Data analysis was done by using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS version 10 windows) for descriptive statistics. Results Statistically significant factors for treatment outcome at p ≤0.05 were; practicing indoor residual spraying (IRS) at home (𝑃 = 0.001; CI), source of prescription (𝑃 = 0.018; CI), finishing dosage (𝑃 = 0.006; CI), frequency of malaria infection (𝑃 = 0.028; CI), Frequency of antimalaria usage (𝑃 = 0.042; CI) and sleeping under insecticide treated nets (ITNs) (𝑃 = 0.039; CI) respectively. Conclusions IRS and ITNs were found to be the major intervention practice of malaria reduction after treatment with ACTs.
    URI
    https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-204112/v1
    https://nru.uncst.go.ug/handle/123456789/5372
    Collections
    • Medical and Health Sciences [2894]

    Research Dissemination Platform copyright © since 2021  UNCST
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Partners
     

     

    Browse

    All of NRU
    Communities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    This Collection
    By Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Research Dissemination Platform copyright © since 2021  UNCST
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Partners