• Login
    View Item 
    •   NRU
    • Journal Publications
    • Natural Sciences
    • Natural Sciences
    • View Item
    •   NRU
    • Journal Publications
    • Natural Sciences
    • Natural Sciences
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    How well do climate models reproduce variability in observed rainfall? A case study of the Lake Victoria basin considering CMIP3, CMIP5 and CORDEX simulations

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Article (2.688Mb)
    Date
    2019
    Author
    Onyutha, Charles
    Rutkowska, Agnieszka
    Nyeko-Ogiramoi, Paul
    Willems, Patrick
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In this study, how well the climate models reproduce variability in observed rainfall was assessed based on General Circulation Models (GCMs) from phase 3 and phase 5 of the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project, i.e., CMIP3 and CMIP5, respectively as well as the Regional Climate Models (RCMs) of COordinated Regional Climate Downscaling EXperiment (CORDEX) over Africa. Observed and climate model based daily rainfall across the Lake Victoria Basin, which is one of the wettest parts of Africa, was considered. Temporal variability was assessed based on the coefficient of variation of daily and annual rainfall, and the maximum dry and wet spell in each year. Furthermore, variation in daily rainfall was assessed in terms of the long-range dependence. Comparison of variability results from observed and climate model based rainfall was made. It was found that the capacity to reproduce variability in observed wet and dry conditions depends on the specific GCM (of CMIP3 or CMIP5) or CORDEX RCM. However, the CORDEX RCMs replicated variability in observed daily rainfall better than the CMIP3 and CMIP5 GCMs. This was due to the spatial resolutions of the CORDEX RCMs which are higher than those of the CMIP3 and CMIP5 GCMs. The ensemble mean of the coefficients of correlation between the variability in observed and that of climate model based rainfall was close to zero for both the GCMs or RCMs. This suggests that analyses can be done on a case by case basis. In other words, GCMs or RCMs which adequately reproduce variability in observed wet and dry conditions can be considered for further statistical analysis of the changes especially on the basis of statistical methods for downscaling. For daily timescale, both the GCMs and RCMs from all the three sets of climate models generally exhibited poor performance in capturing the time of occurrences and the magnitudes of rainfall events (when considered in a combined way). To reliably assess long-term rainfall changes, it is vital to characterize natural variation in terms of the statistical dependence. With respect to natural variability of rainfall at local scales, there is room for further improvement of the climate models; however, whether theory of fractals and/or concepts of scaling behavior or self-similarity can explicitly contribute in that respect is a crucial consideration. Results from this study gave some insights in the reasonableness of the future rainfall projections.
    URI
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1611-4(0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV)
    https://nru.uncst.go.ug/handle/123456789/4746
    Collections
    • Natural Sciences [604]

    Research Dissemination Platform copyright © since 2021  UNCST
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Partners
     

     

    Browse

    All of NRU
    Communities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    This Collection
    By Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Research Dissemination Platform copyright © since 2021  UNCST
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Partners