Browsing by Author "Musoke, Richard"

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Assessment of Changes in Risk Behaviors During 3 Years of Posttrial Follow-up of Male Circumcision Trial Participants Uncircumcised at Trial Closure in Rakai, Uganda
    (American journal of epidemiology, 2012) Kong, Xiangrong; Kigozi, Godfrey; Nalugoda, Fred; Musoke, Richard; Kagaayi, Joseph; Latkin, Carl; Ssekubugu, Robert; Lutalo, Tom; Nantume, Betty; Iga, Boaz; Wawer, Maria; Serwadda, David; Gray, Ronald
    Risk compensation associated with male circumcision has been a concern for male circumcision scale-up programs. Using posttrial data collected during 2007–2011 on 2,137 male circumcision trial participants who were uncircumcised at trial closure in Rakai, Uganda, the authors evaluated their sexual behavioral changes during approximately 3 years’ follow-up after trial closure. Eighty-one percent of the men self-selected for male circumcision during the period, and their sociodemographic and risk profiles were comparable to those of men remaining uncircumcised. Linear models for marginal probabilities of repeated outcomes estimate that 3.3% (P < 0.0001) of the male circumcision acceptors reduced their engagement in nonmarital relations, whereas there was no significant change among men remaining uncircumcised. Significant decreases in condom use occurred in both male circumcision acceptors (−9.2% with all partners and −7.0% with nonmarital partners) and nonacceptors (−12.4% and −13.5%, respectively), and these were predominantly among younger men. However, the magnitudes of decrease in condom use were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Additionally, significant decreases in sex-related alcohol consumption were observed in both groups (−7.8% in male circumcision acceptors and −6.1% in nonacceptors), mainly among older men. In summary, there was no evidence of risk compensation associated with male circumcision among this cohort of men during 3 years of posttrial follow-up.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effects of Medical Male Circumcision (MC) on Plasma HIV Viral Load in HIV+ HAART Nai¨ve Men; Rakai, Uganda
    (PLoS ONE, 2014) Kigozi, Godfrey; Musoke, Richard; Kighoma, Nehemiah; Watya, Stephen; Serwadda, David; Nalugoda, Fred; Kiwanuka, Noah; Wabwire-Mangen, Fred; Tobian, Aaron; Makumbi, Fredrick; Galiwango, Ronald Moses; Sewankambo, Nelson; Nkale, James; Kigozi Nalwoga, Grace; Anyokorit, Margaret; Lutalo, Tom; Henry Gray, Ronald; Wawer, Maria Joan
    Medical male circumcision (MC) of HIV-infected men may increase plasma HIV viral load and place female partners at risk of infection. We assessed the effect of MC on plasma HIV viral load in HIV-infected men in Rakai, Uganda. 195 consenting HIV-positive, HAART naı¨ve men aged 12 and above provided blood for plasma HIV viral load testing before surgery and weekly for six weeks and at 2 and 3 months post surgery. Data were also collected on baseline social demographic characteristics and CD4 counts. Change in log10 plasma viral load between baseline and follow-up visits was estimated using paired t tests and multivariate generalized estimating equation (GEE).
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluation of current rapid HIV test algorithms in Rakai, Uganda
    (Journal of virological methods, 2013) Galiwango, Ronald M.; Musoke, Richard; Lubyayi, Lawrence; Ssekubugu, Robert; Kalibbala, Sarah; Ssekweyama, Viola; Mirembe, Viola; Nakigozi, Gertrude; Reynolds, Steven J.; Serwadda, David; Gray, Ronald H.; Kigozi, Godfrey
    Rapid HIV tests are a crucial component of HIV diagnosis in resource limited settings. In Uganda, the Ministry of Health allows for both serial and parallel HIV rapid testing using Determine, Stat- Pak and Uni-Gold. In serial testing, a non-reactive result on Determine ends testing. The performance of serial and parallel algorithms with Determine and Stat-Pak test kits was assessed. A cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy evaluation using three rapid HIV test kits as per the recommended parallel test algorithm was followed by EIA-WB testing with estimates of the performance of serial testing algorithm. In 2520 participants tested by parallel rapid algorithms, 0.6% had weakly reactive result. Parallel testing had 99.7% sensitivity and 99.8% specificity. If Stat-Pak was used as the first screening test for a serial algorithm, the sensitivity was 99.6% and specificity 99.7%. However, if Determine was used as the screening test, sensitivity was 97.3% and specificity 99.9%. Serial testing with Stat-Pak as the initial screening test performed as well as parallel testing, but Determine was a less sensitive screen. Serial testing could be cost saving.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluation of the Safety and Efficiency of the Dorsal Slit and Sleeve Methods of Male Circumcision Provided by Physicians and Clinical Officers in Rakai, Uganda
    (BJU international, 2012) Buwembo, Dennis; Musoke, Richard; Kigozi, Godfrey; Sempijja, Victor; Serwadda, David; Makumbi, Frederick; Watya, Stephen; Namuguzi, Dan; Nalugoda, Fred; Kiwanuka, Noah; Sewankambo, Nelson K.; Mangen, Fred Wabwire; Lutalo, Tom; Kiggundu, Valerian; Anyokorit, Margaret; Nkale, James; Kighoma, Nehemia; Wawer, Maria J.; Gray, Ronald H.
    To assess safety and efficiency of the dorsal slit and sleeve male circumcision (MC) procedures performed by physicians and clinical officers.We evaluated the time required for surgery and moderate / severe adverse events (AEs), among circumcisions by trained physicians and clinical officers using sleeve and dorsal slit methods. Univariate and multivariate regression with robust variance was used to assess factors associated with time for surgery (linear regression) and adverse events (logistic regression). Six physicians and 8 clinical officers conducted 1934 and 3218 MCs, respectively. There were 2471 dorsal slit and 2681 sleeve procedures. The mean duration of surgery was 33 minutes for newly trained providers and decreased to ~20 minutes after ~100 circumcisions. The adjusted mean duration of surgery for dorsal slit was significantly shorter than that for sleeve method (Δ −2.8 minutes, p- <0.001). The duration of surgery was longer for clinical officers than physicians performing the sleeve procedure, but not the dorsal slit procedure. Crude AEs rates were 0.6% for dorsal slit and 1.4% with the sleeve method (p=0.006). However, there were no significant differences after multivariate adjustment. Use of cautery significantly reduced time needed for surgery (Δ − 4.0 minutes, p =0.008), but was associated with higher rates of AEs (adjusted odds ratio 2.13, 95%CI 1.26–3.61, p=0.005).The dorsal slit resection method of male circumcision is faster and safer than sleeve resection, and can be safely performed by non-physicians. However, use of cautery may be inadvisable in this setting.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Safety and Acceptance of the PrePex Device for Non- Surgical Adult Male Circumcision in Rakai, Uganda. A Non-Randomized Observational Study
    (PloS one, 2014) Kigozi, Godfrey; Musoke, Richard; Watya, Stephen; Kighoma, Nehemia; Nkale, James; Nakafeero, Mary; Namuguzi, Dan; Serwada, David; Nalugoda, Fred; Sewankambo, Nelson; Wawer, Maria Joan; Gray, Ronald Henry
    To assess the safety and acceptance of the PrePex device for medical male circumcision (MMC) in rural Uganda.In an observational study, HIV-uninfected, uncircumcised men aged 18 and older who requested elective MMC were informed about the PrePex and dorsal slit methods and offered a free choice of their preferred procedure. 100 men received PrePex to assess preliminary safety (aim 1). An additional 329 men, 250 chose PrePex and 79 chose Dorsal slit, were enrolled following approval by the Safety Monitoring Committee (aim 2). Men were followed up at 7 days to assess adverse events (AEs) and to remove the PrePex device. Wound healing was assessed at 4 weeks, with subsequent weekly follow up until completed healing.The PrePex device was contraindicated in 5.7% of men due to a tight prepuce or phimosis/adhesions. Among 429 enrolled men 350 (82.0%) got the PrePex device and 79 (18.0%) the dorsal slit procedure. 250 of 329 men (76.0%) who were invited to choose between the 2 procedures chose Prepex. There were 9 AEs (2.6%) with the PrePex, of which 5 (1.4%) were severe complications, 4 due to patient self-removal of the device leading to edema and urinary obstruction requiring emergency surgical circumcision, and one due to wound dehiscence following device removal. 71.8% of men reported an unpleasant odor prior to PrePex removal. Cumulative rates of completed wound healing with the PrePex were 56.7% at week 4, 84.8% week 5, 97.6% week 6 and 98.6% week 7, compared to 98.7% at week 4 with dorsal slit (p<0.0001).The PrePex device was well accepted, but healing was slower than with dorsal slit surgery. Severe complications, primarily following PrePex self-removal, required rapid access to emergency surgical facilities. The need to return for removal and delayed healing may increase Program cost and client burden.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Use of a mixture of lignocaine and bupivacaine vs lignocaine alone for male circumcision under local anaesthesia in Rakai, Uganda
    (BJU international, 2012) Kigozi, Godfrey; Musoke, Richard; Anyokorit, Margaret; Nkale, James; Kighoma, Nehemiah; Ssebanenya, William; Mwinike, Joshua; Watya, Stephen; Nalugoda, Fred; Kagaayi, Joseph; Nalwoga, Grace; Nakigozi, Gertrude; Kiwanuka, Noah; Makumbi, Frederick; Lutalo, Tom; Serwadda, David; Wawer, Maria; Gray, Ronald
    Male circumcision (MC) has been shown to reduce the risk of HIV acquisition by 50 – 60% [ 1 – 3 ] and the WHO now recommends it as one of the proven methods for HIV prevention [ 4 ] . Several programmes in sub-Saharan Africa have initiated MC implementation. For MC to be effective at a community level there is need to achieve high MC coverage, and modelling suggests that the higher the prevalence of MC the greater the impact on HIV incidence [ 5 ] . One reason consistently cited by men for not accepting MC is fear of pain during surgery [ 6 – 10 ] . Our experience in Rakai is that when men are offered MC, only a few men initially come for surgery, and the majority, fearing pain, wait to hear the experiences of men who have had surgery.