Browsing by Author "Muhindo, Mary K."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Artemisinin-Based Combination Therapies Are Efficacious and Safe for Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria in HIV-Infected Ugandan Children
    (Clinical infectious diseases, 2014) Kakuru, Abel; Achan, Jane; Muhindo, Mary K.; Ikilezi, Gloria; Arinaitwe, Emmanuel; Mwangwa, Florence; Ruel, Theodore; Clark, Tamara D.; Charlebois, Edwin; Kamya, Moses R.; Tappero, Jordan W.; Dorsey, Grant
    Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) are highly efficacious and safe, but data from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected children concurrently receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) and ACTs are limited. We evaluated 28-day outcomes following malaria treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (AL) or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) in 2 cohorts of HIV-infected Ugandan children taking various ART regimens. In one cohort, children <6 years of age were randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor–based ART and treated with AL for uncomplicated malaria. In another cohort, children <12 months of age were started on nevirapine-based ART if they were eligible, and randomized to AL or DP for the treatment of their first and all subsequent uncomplicated malaria episodes. There were 773 and 165 treatments for malaria with AL and DP, respectively. Initial response to therapy was excellent, with 99% clearance of parasites and <1% risk of repeat therapy within 3 days. Recurrent parasitemia within 28 days was common following AL treatment. The risk of recurrent parasitemia was significantly lower among children taking LPV/r-based ART compared with children taking nevirapine-based ART following AL treatment (15.3% vs 35.5%, P = .009), and those treated with DP compared with AL (8.6% vs 36.2%, P < .001). Both ACT regimens were safe and well tolerated. Treatment of uncomplicated malaria with AL or DP was efficacious and safe in HIV-infected children taking ART. However, there was a high risk of recurrent parasitemia following AL treatment, which was significantly lower in children taking LPV/r-based ART compared with nevirapine-based ART.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Efficacy and Safety of Three Regimens for the Prevention of Malaria in Young HIV-Exposed Ugandan Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    (AIDS, 2014) Kamya, Moses R.; Kapisi, James; Bigira, Victor; Tamara, D. Clark; Kinara, Stephen; Mwangwa, Florence; Muhindo, Mary K.; Kakuru, Abel; Aweeka, Francesca T.; Achan, Jane; Havlir, Diane V.; Rosenthal, Philip J.; Dorsey, Grant
    Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TS) prophylaxis is recommended for HIV-exposed infants until breastfeeding ends and HIV infection has been excluded. Extending prophylaxis with a focus on preventing malaria may be beneficial in high transmission areas. We investigated three regimens for the prevention of malaria in young HIV-exposed children. Tororo, Uganda, a rural area with intense, year-round, malaria transmission. 200 infants aged 4-5 months enrolled and 186 randomized after cessation of breastfeeding and confirmed to be HIV uninfected (median 10 months of age). No chemoprevention, monthly sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), daily TS, or monthly dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) given from randomization to 24 months of age. The primary outcome was the incidence of malaria during the intervention period. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of hospitalization, diarrheal illness, or respiratory tract infection; prevalence of anemia and asymptomatic parasitemia; measures of safety; and incidence of malaria over 1 year after the intervention was stopped. During the intervention, the incidence of malaria in the no chemoprevention group was 6.28 episodes per person-year at risk. Protective efficacy was 69% (95% CI, 53-80%, p<0.001) for DP, 49% (95% CI, 23-66%, p=0.001) for TS, and 9% for SP (95% CI, −35 to 38%, p=0.65). There were no significant differences in any secondary outcomes, with the exception of a lower prevalence of asymptomatic parasitemia in the DP arm. Monthly chemoprevention with DP was safe and associated with a significant reduction in malaria in young HIV-exposed children.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Protective Efficacy and Safety of Three Antimalarial Regimens for the Prevention of Malaria in Young Ugandan Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001689
    (PLoS medicine, 2014) Bigira, Victor; Kapisi, James; Clark, Tamara D.; Kinara, Stephen; Mwangwa, Stephen; Muhindo, Mary K.; Osterbauer, Beth; Aweeka, Francesca T.; Huang, Liusheng; Achan, Jane; Havlir, Diane V.; Rosenthal, Philip J.; Kamya, Moses R.; Dorsey, Grant
    Chemoprevention offers a promising strategy for prevention of malaria in African children. However, the optimal chemoprevention drug and dosing strategy is unclear in areas of year-round transmission and resistance to many antimalarial drugs. To compare three available regimens, we conducted an open-label randomized controlled trial of chemoprevention in Ugandan children. Methods and Findings: This study was conducted between June 28, 2010, and September 25, 2013. 400 infants were enrolled and 393 randomized at 6 mo of age to no chemoprevention, monthly sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TS), or monthly dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP). Study drugs were administered at home without supervision. Piperaquine (PQ) levels were used as a measure of compliance in the DP arm. Participants were given insecticide-treated bednets, and caregivers were encouraged to bring their child to a study clinic whenever they were Chemoprevention was stopped at 24 mo of age, and participants followed-up an additional year. Primary outcome was the incidence of malaria during the intervention period. During the intervention, the incidence of malaria in the no chemoprevention arm was 6.95 episodes per person-year at risk. Protective efficacy was 58% (95% CI, 45%–67%, p,0.001) for DP, 28% (95% CI, 7%–44%, p = 0.01) for TS, and 7% for SP (95% CI, 219% to 28%, p = 0.57). PQ levels were below the detection limit 52% of the time when malaria was diagnosed in the DP arm, suggesting non-adherence. There were no differences between the study arms in the incidence of serious adverse events during the intervention and the incidence of malaria during the 1-y period after the intervention was stopped.Conclusions: For preventing malaria in children living in an area of high transmission intensity, monthly DP was the mostefficacious and safe, although adherence may pose a problem.Monthly SP and daily TS may not be appropriate in areas with high transmission intensity and frequent resistance to antifolates.