Soil Property Responses to Push-Pull Cropping in East Africa

dc.contributor.authorAmboka, Grace Mercy;
dc.contributor.authorJonsson, Mattias;
dc.contributor.authorApel, Celina ;
dc.contributor.authorMeinhof, David;
dc.contributor.authorLiepa, Adomas;
dc.contributor.authorChidawanyika, Frank;
dc.contributor.authorDetebo, Andargachew;
dc.contributor.authorLibrán‐Embid, Felipe;
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Emily A;
dc.contributor.authorSteffan‐Dewenter, Ingolf;
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Marcell K;
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jie;
dc.contributor.authorThiel, Michael;
dc.contributor.authorOtim, Michael;
dc.contributor.authorMugisha, James;
dc.contributor.authorBahta, Ghebremedhin Belay;
dc.contributor.authorMaina, Fredah;
dc.contributor.authorMurage, Alice;
dc.contributor.authorFeit, Benjamin;
dc.contributor.authorDahlin, A. Sigrun
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-27T09:56:26Z
dc.date.issued2026-04-10
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT Push-pull technology is increasingly promoted in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly for pest management and enhancing crop productivity. However, its influence on soil properties remains understudied, despite its potential implications for soil health and sustainable soil fertility management. This study examines soil properties in push-pull and conventional non-push-pull cropping systems. Soil samples were collected from push-pull and conventional plots in Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, and Uganda. We examined the associations between soil physicochemical properties and cropping systems, along with key components of push-pull, namely Desmodium coverage and plot age, and manure and mineral fertiliser application. Overall, there were a few differences in soil properties between push-pull and conventional cultivation. In Kenya and Uganda, where Desmodium cover varied considerably, higher cover was positively associated with soil organic matter, cation-exchange capacity, and multiple nutrients. In Rwanda, Desmodium cover was positively associated only with phosphorus. Plot age in Kenya was negatively associated with pH and potassium, suggesting acidification from N2 fixation and potassium mining in the system. In Kenya, manure application was negatively associated with soil pH, CEC and several nutrients, while in Uganda, it was positively associated with calcium, sodium and zinc. In Ethiopia, manure application was positively associated with potassium and zinc, but only when testing the pushpull systems separately. Mineral fertiliser use was negatively associated with potassium and pH in Kenya, the only country with considerable use of mineral fertilisers. The data highlight a need for adaptive soil and crop management, including affordable non-acidifying N fertilisers and liming products for long-term sustainability of the push-pull system. The complexity in farmer adoption and practices, and the underlying soil and climate conditions, limit our ability to disentangle the contribution of system components to the effects of the push-pull system. Nevertheless, our findings highlight the complex and context-dependent associations of push-pull cropping and soil properties, underscoring the need for site-specific management to sustain soil health and crop productivity across sub-Saharan Africa.
dc.identifier.citationAmboka, Grace Mercy, Mattias Jonsson, Celina Apel, et al. 'Soil Property Responses to Push‐Pull Cropping in East Africa', Food and Energy Security, vol. 15/no. 3, (2026), .
dc.identifier.issnEISSN 2048-3694
dc.identifier.urihttps://nru.uncst.go.ug/handle/123456789/12091
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc
dc.subjectcontext-dependence
dc.subjectDesmodium
dc.subjectecological intensification
dc.subjectmixed cropping
dc.subjectsoil fertility
dc.subjectsub-Saharan Africa
dc.titleSoil Property Responses to Push-Pull Cropping in East Africa
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Food and Energy Security - 2026 - Amboka - Soil Property Responses to Push‐Pull Cropping in East Africa.pdf
Size:
4.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: