Attitudes and Perceptions about the Research and Ethics Committee in Kampala, Uganda

dc.contributor.authorOchieng, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorIbingira, Charles B. R.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-17T12:26:19Z
dc.date.available2021-12-17T12:26:19Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThe Makerere University Faculty of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee reviews and approves more than 100 new research protocols a year, yet its activities had never been evaluated as far as the researchers are concerned. Methods and results This was a cross sectional study at Makerere University Faculty of Medicine and Mulago Teaching Hospital. The survey population included all staff involved in research at the post graduate level and faculty. Most of the respondents agreed that decisions of the REC were binding 53 (75.7%),15 (21%) hold that were variable and 2(2.9%) biased. The biased attitudes of researchers regarding protocol review reduces as researchers present more protocols to the REC.en_US
dc.identifier.citationIbingira, C. B., & Ochieng, J. (2010). Attitudes and perceptions about the research and ethics committee in Kampala, Uganda.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nru.uncst.go.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/734
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe International Journal Of Medicineen_US
dc.subjectMedical ethicsen_US
dc.subjectHuman Research Ethicsen_US
dc.subjectResearch Ethics Committeeen_US
dc.subjectAttitudesen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.titleAttitudes and Perceptions about the Research and Ethics Committee in Kampala, Ugandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Attitudes and Perceptions about the Research and.pdf
Size:
354.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: