Lifetime fitness consequences of early-life ecological hardship in a wild mammal population

dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Harry H.
dc.contributor.authorVitikainen, Emma I. K.
dc.contributor.authorMwanguhya, Francis
dc.contributor.authorBusinge, Robert
dc.contributor.authorKyabulima, Solomon
dc.contributor.authorHares, Michelle C.
dc.contributor.authorInzani, Emma
dc.contributor.authorKalema-Zikusoka, Gladys
dc.contributor.authorMwesige, Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorNichols, Hazel J.
dc.contributor.authorSanderson, Jennifer L.
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Faye J.
dc.contributor.authorCant, Michael A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-05T13:47:43Z
dc.date.available2023-02-05T13:47:43Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractEarly-life ecological conditions have major effects on survival and reproduction. Numerous studies in wild systems show fitness benefits of good quality early-life ecological conditions (“silver-spoon” effects). Recently, however, some studies have reported that poor-quality early-life ecological conditions are associated with later-life fitness advantages and that the effect of early-life conditions can be sex-specific. Furthermore, few studies have investigated the effect of the variability of early-life ecological conditions on later-life fitness. Here, we test how the mean and variability of early-life ecological conditions affect the longevity and reproduction of males and females using 14 years of data on wild banded mongooses (Mungos mungo). Males that experienced highly variable ecological conditions during development lived longer and had greater lifetime fitness, while those that experienced poor early-life conditions lived longer but at a cost of reduced fertility. In females, there were no such effects. Our study suggests that exposure to more variable environments in early life can result in lifetime fitness benefits, whereas differences in the mean early-life conditions experienced mediate a life-history trade-off between survival and reproduction. It also demonstrates how early-life ecological conditions can produce different selection pressures on males and females.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMarshall, H. H., Vitikainen, E. I., Mwanguhya, F., Businge, R., Kyabulima, S., Hares, M. C., ... & Cant, M. A. (2017). Lifetime fitness consequences of early‐life ecological hardship in a wild mammal population. Ecology and evolution, 7(6), 1712-1724. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2747en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1002/ece3.2747
dc.identifier.urihttps://nru.uncst.go.ug/handle/123456789/7555
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEcology and evolutionen_US
dc.subjectEarly-lifeen_US
dc.subjectEcological variabilityen_US
dc.subjectFitness effectsen_US
dc.subjectLife-history strategyen_US
dc.subjectMammalen_US
dc.subjectSex-specificen_US
dc.titleLifetime fitness consequences of early-life ecological hardship in a wild mammal populationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lifetime fitness consequences of early-life ecological hardship.pdf
Size:
776.59 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections