Why performance-based contracting failed in Uganda e An “open-box” evaluation of a complex health system intervention

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSsengooba, Freddie
dc.contributor.authorMcPake, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Natasha
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-11T15:32:30Z
dc.date.available2022-03-11T15:32:30Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractPerformance-based contracting (PBC) is a tool that links rewards to attainment of measurable performance targets. Significant problems remain in the methods used to evaluate this tool. The primary focus of evaluations on the effects of PBC (black-box) and less attention to how these effects arise (open-box) generates suboptimal policy learning. A black-box impact evaluation of PBC pilot by the Development Research Group of the World Bank (DRG) and the Ministry of Health (MOH) concluded that PBC was ineffective. This paper reports a theory-based case study intended to clarify how and why PBC failed to achieve its objectives. To explain the observed PBC implementation and responses of participants, this case study employed two related theories i.e. complex adaptive system and expectancy theory respectively. A prospective study trailed the implementation of PBC (2003e2006) while collecting experiences of participants at district and hospital levels. Significant problems were encountered in the implementation of PBC that reflected its inadequate design. As problems were encountered, hasty adaptations resulted in a de facto intervention distinct from the one implied at the design stage. For example, inadequate time was allowed for the selection of service targets by the health centres yet they got ‘locked-in’ to these poor choices. The learning curve and workload among performance auditors weakened the validity of audit results. Above all, financial shortfalls led to delays, short-cuts and uncertainty about the size and payment of bonuses. The lesson for those intending to implement similar interventions is that PBC should not be attempted ‘on the cheap’. It requires a plan to boost local institutional and technical capacities of implementers. It also requires careful consideration of the responses of multiple actors e both insiders and outsiders to the intended change process. Given the costs and complexity of PBC implementation, strengthening conventional approaches that are better attuned to low income contexts (financing resource inputs and systems management) remains a viable policy option towards improving health service delivery.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSsengooba, F., McPake, B., & Palmer, N. (2012). Why performance-based contracting failed in Uganda–an “open-box” evaluation of a complex health system intervention. Social science & medicine, 75(2), 377-383.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953612002729
dc.identifier.urihttps://nru.uncst.go.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/2776
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSocial science & medicineen_US
dc.subjectHealth programen_US
dc.subjectevaluationen_US
dc.subjectHealth systemen_US
dc.subjectCase study Ugandaen_US
dc.titleWhy performance-based contracting failed in Uganda e An “open-box” evaluation of a complex health system interventionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Why performance-based contracting failed in Uganda e An “open-box”.pdf
Size:
292.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Medical and Health Sciences