Verbal Autopsy: Evaluation of Methods to Certify Causes of Death in Uganda

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMpimbaza, Arthur
dc.contributor.authorFiller, Scott
dc.contributor.authorKatureebe, Agaba
dc.contributor.authorQuick, Linda
dc.contributor.authorStaedke, Sarah G.
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-24T09:44:53Z
dc.date.available2023-11-24T09:44:53Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractTo assess different methods for determining cause of death from verbal autopsy (VA) questionnaire data, the intra-rater reliability of Physician-Certified Verbal Autopsy (PCVA) and the accuracy of PCVA, expert-derived (non-hierarchical) and data-driven (hierarchal) algorithms were assessed for determining common causes of death in Ugandan children. A verbal autopsy validation study was conducted from 2008-2009 in three different sites in Uganda. The dataset included 104 neonatal deaths (0-27 days) and 615 childhood deaths (1-59 months) with the cause(s) of death classified by PCVA and physician review of hospital medical records (the ‘reference standard’). Of the original 719 questionnaires, 141 (20%) were selected for a second review by the same physicians; the repeat cause(s) of death were compared to the original,and agreement assessed using the Kappa statistic.Physician reviewers’ refined non-hierarchical algorithms for common causes of death from existing expert algorithms, from which, hierarchal algorithms were developed. The accuracy of PCVA, non-hierarchical, and hierarchical algorithms for determining cause(s) of death from all 719 VA questionnaires was determined using the reference standard. Overall, intra-rater repeatability was high (83% agreement, Kappa 0.79 [95% CI 0.76-0.82]). PCVA performed well, with high specificity for determining cause of neonatal (>67%), and childhood (>83%) deaths, resulting in fairly accurate cause-specific mortality fraction (CSMF) estimates. For most causes of death in children, non-hierarchical algorithms had higher sensitivity, but correspondingly lower specificity, than PCVA and hierarchical algorithms, resulting in inaccurate CSMF estimates. Hierarchical algorithms were specific for most causes of death, and CSMF estimates were comparable to the reference standard and PCVA. Inter-rater reliability of PCVA was high, and overall PCVA performed well. Hierarchical algorithms performed better than non-hierarchical algorithms due to higher specificity and more accurate CSMF estimates. Use of PCVA to determine cause of death from VA questionnaire data is reasonable while automated data-driven algorithms are improved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMpimbaza, A., Filler, S., Katureebe, A., Quick, L., Chandramohan, D., & Staedke, S. G. (2015). Verbal autopsy: evaluation of methods to certify causes of death in Uganda. PloS one, 10(6), e0128801.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128801en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nru.uncst.go.ug/handle/123456789/9371
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPloS oneen_US
dc.subjectDeathen_US
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.subjectPhysiciansen_US
dc.titleVerbal Autopsy: Evaluation of Methods to Certify Causes of Death in Ugandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Verbal Autopsy Evaluation of Methods to Certify Causes of Death in Uganda.pdf
Size:
433.39 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Verbal Autopsy: Evaluation of Methods to Certify Causes of Death in Uganda
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Medical and Health Sciences