Investigation of flow-rainfall co-variation for catchments selected based on the two main sources of River Nile

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorOnyutha, Charles
dc.contributor.authorWillems, Patrick
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-24T13:31:59Z
dc.date.available2022-09-24T13:31:59Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThe co-variation of rainfall and flow was assessed in four selected catchments of the River Nile which has two main sources including the White Nile (in the Equatorial region) and the Blue Nile (from the Ethiopian highlands). The selected catchments included Kyoga and Kagera (from the Equatorial region), as well as Blue Nile and Atbara (in Sudan and Ethiopia). In each catchment, the flow-rainfall co-variation was investigated at both seasonal and annual time scales. To explain aggregated variation at larger temporal scale while investigating the possible change in catchment behavior, which may interfere with the flow-rainfall relationship, rainfall-runoff modeling was done at daily time scale using data (falling within the period 1949-2003) from Kagera and Blue Nile i.e. the major catchment of each region where the River Nile emanates. Correlation analysis was conducted to assess how well the variation of flow and that of catchment-wide rainfall resonate. The co-occurrence of the changes in observed and simulated overland flow was examined using the Quantile Perturbation Method (QPM). Trends in the model residuals were detected using the Mann-Kendal (MK) and Cumulative Rank Difference (CRD) tests. The null hypothesis H0 (no correlation between rainfall and flow) was rejected at the significance level α of 5% for all the selected catchments. The temporal changes in terms of the QPM anomalies for both the observed and simulated flow were in a close agreement. The evidence to reject the H0 (no trend in the model residuals) was generally statistically insufficient at α = 5% for all the models and selected catchments considering both the MK and CRD tests. These results indicate that change in catchment behavior due to anthropogenic influence in the Nile basin over the selected time period was minimal. Thus, the overall rainfall-runoff generation processes of the catchments did not change in a significant way over the selected data period. The temporal flow variation could be attributed mainly to the rainfall variation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOnyutha, C., & Willems, P. (2018). Investigation of flow-rainfall co-variation for catchments selected based on the two main sources of River Nile. Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 32(3), 623-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1397-9en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1397-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://nru.uncst.go.ug/handle/123456789/4824
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherStochastic environmental research and risk assessmenten_US
dc.subjectRainfall-Runoff Modelingen_US
dc.subjectCRD Trend Testen_US
dc.subjectVHMen_US
dc.subjectNAMen_US
dc.subjectHBVen_US
dc.subjectRiver Nileen_US
dc.subjectQPMen_US
dc.titleInvestigation of flow-rainfall co-variation for catchments selected based on the two main sources of River Nileen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Onyutha-Nile-rainfallflowcovariation (SERRA 2017).pdf
Size:
1.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Natural Sciences