Animal and human tungiasis-related knowledge and treatment practices among animal keeping households in Bugiri District, South-Eastern Uganda

dc.contributor.authorMutebi, Francis
dc.contributor.authorJürgen, Krückenb
dc.contributor.authorGeorg, von Samson-Himmelstjernab
dc.contributor.authorWaiswa, Charles
dc.contributor.authorNorbert, Mencke
dc.contributor.authorEneku, Wilfred
dc.contributor.authorTamale, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorHermann, Feldmeier
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-02T11:30:33Z
dc.date.available2025-02-02T11:30:33Z
dc.date.issued2018-10
dc.description.abstractBackground: Zoonotic tungiasis caused by Tunga penetrans remains a serious public and animal health problem among endemic villages in Uganda and many sub Saharan African countries. Studies on human and animal tungiasis-related knowledge and treatment practices in endemic communities have never been undertaken, a limitation to development of sustainable control measures. Methods: A cross sectional study using semi-structured questionnaires (Supplementary file S1) was conducted among 236 animal rearing households in 10 endemic villages in Bugiri District, South-Eastern Uganda. Focus group discussions and observation checklists were used to validate and clarify the findings. Results: Most respondents knew the aetiology (89.4%), clinical signs (98%) and the ecology of T. penetrans as well as the major risk factors of human tungiasis (65.2%). In contrast, very few respondents were aware of animal tungiasis. Only 4.8% of those with infected animals on the compound knew that some of their animals were infected and 13.6% of the respondents had ever seen tungiasis-affected animals. Pigs (13.1%, n = 31) and dogs (0.85%, n = 2) were the only T. penetrans animal hosts known to animal owners. Affected humans were treated by extraction of embedded sand fleas using non-sterile sharp instruments in all households that reported occurrence of human tungiasis at least once (n = 227). Also, affected animals were mainly treated by mechanical removal of embedded sand fleas in households that have ever experienced animal tungiasis (four out of 12; 33.3%). In a few instances, plant and animal pesticides (n = 3) and other chemicals such as grease, paraffin and wood preservative (n = 3) were also used to treat animal tungiasis. Conclusion: The study revealed a high level of knowledge on human tungiasis but inadequate knowledge on the zoonotic nature of tungiasis. Commonly applied methods for treatment of human and animal tungiasis are a health hazard by themselves. Concerted i.e. One Health-based efforts aiming at promoting appropriate treatment of tungiasis, adequate living conditions and increased awareness on tungiasis in the communities are indicated in order to eliminate tungiasis-associated disease.
dc.identifier.citationMutebi, F., Krücken, J., von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G., Waiswa, C., Mencke, N., Eneku, W., ... & Feldmeier, H. (2018). Animal and human tungiasis-related knowledge and treatment practices among animal keeping households in Bugiri District, South-Eastern Uganda. Acta tropica, 177, 81-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.10.003
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.10.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://nru.uncst.go.ug/handle/123456789/9909
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherActa tropica
dc.titleAnimal and human tungiasis-related knowledge and treatment practices among animal keeping households in Bugiri District, South-Eastern Uganda
dc.typeArticle
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: