Comparison of short messaging service self-reported adherence with other adherence measures in a demonstration project of HIV preexposure prophylaxis in Kenya and Uganda

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2018
Authors
Musinguzi, Nicholas
Muwonge, Timothy
Ngure, Kenneth
Katabira, Elly
Mugo, Nelly
O’Rourke Burns, Bridget Frances
Baeten, Jared M.
Heffron, Renee
Haberer, Jessica E.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
AIDS (London, England)
Abstract
Short messaging service (SMS) can collect adherence data on a frequent basis and is relatively anonymous, and therefore could potentially reduce recall and social desirability biases prevalent in other self-reported measures. Methods: We compared SMS self-reported adherence with three self-reported adherence questions (rating of ability to adhere, frequency of doses taken, percentage of doses taken) and two objective adherence measures [electronic adherence monitoring (EAM) and plasma tenofovir levels] using data from HIV-uninfected members of serodiscordant couples enrolled in a preexposure prophylaxis demonstration project in Kenya and Uganda. Results: Of 373 enrolled participants, 256 (69%) were male and median age at enrolment was 29 years (26, 35). Fifty-two percent were from Kenya and median education at enrolment was 10 years (7,12). Overall, median adherence was 90, 75, 85,94 and 79%, respectively, for self-report by SMS, rating, frequency, percentage and EAM adherence. Spearman’s correlation coefficient between SMS and interviewer- administered self-reported measures was 0.18 for rating and frequency, 0.22 for percentage and 0.14 for EAM (all P< 0.001). The estimated difference in average adherence between SMS and self-reported rating, frequency, percentage adherence and EAM was 8.1 (P < 0.001), 0.3 (P = 0.81), −5.2 (P < 0.001) and 9.5 (P < 0.001), respectively. Area under the receiver-operating curve assessing the ability of SMS self-report to discriminate between detectable and undetectable tenofovir was 0.51. Conclusion: Our study found low correlation between SMS self-report and other self-reported and objective adherence measures and did not discriminate between detectable and undetectable plasma tenofovir levels. Future use of SMS self-report should explore alternative means for reducing potential biases.
Description
Keywords
Adherence, HIV preexposure prophylaxis, Kenya, self-reported adherence, Short messaging service
Citation
Musinguzi, N., Muwonge, T., Ngure, K., Katabira, E., Mugo, N., Burns, B. F. O. R., ... & Haberer, J. E. (2018). Comparison of short messaging service self-reported adherence with other adherence measures in a demonstration project of HIV preexposure prophylaxis in Kenya and Uganda. AIDS (London, England), 32(15), 2237. doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000001955.