Browsing by Author "Nantaba, Harriet"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Barriers to and acceptability of provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling and adopting HIV prevention behaviours in rural Uganda: A qualitative study(Journal of health psychology, 2015) Kiene, Susan M.; Sileo, Katelyn; Wanyenze, Rhoda K.; Lule, Haruna; Bateganya, Moses H.; Jasperse, Joseph; Nantaba, HarrietIn Uganda, a nation-wide scale-up of provider initiated HIV testing and counseling (PITC) presents an opportunity to deliver HIV prevention services to large numbers of people. In a rural Ugandan hospital, focus group discussions and key informant interviews were conducted with outpatients receiving PITC and staff to explore the HIV prevention information, motivation, and behavioral skills strengths and weaknesses, and community and structural-level barriers to PITC acceptability and HIV prevention among this population. Strengths and weakness occurred at all levels, and results suggest brief client-centered interventions during PITC may be an effective approach to increase prevention behaviours in outpatient settings.Item Initial Outcomes of Provider-Initiated Routine HIV Testing and Counseling During Outpatient Care at a Rural Ugandan Hospital: Risky Sexual Behavior, Partner HIV Testing, Disclosure, and HIV Care Seeking(AIDS patient Care and STDs, 2010) Kiene, Susan M.; Bateganya, Moses; Wanyenze, Rhoda K.; Lule, Haruna; Nantaba, Harriet; Stein, Michael D.Provider-initiated routine HIV testing is being scaled up throughout the world, however, little is known about the outcomes of routine HIV testing on subsequent behavior. This study examined the initial outcomes of provider-initiated routine HIV testing at a rural Ugandan hospital regarding partner HIV testing, sexual risk behavior, disclosure, and HIV care seeking. In a prospective cohort study, 245 outpatients receiving routine HIV testing completed baseline and 3-month follow-up interviews. After receiving routine HIV testing the percentage of participants engaging in risky sex decreased from 70.1% to 50.3% among HIV-negative and from 75.0% to 53.5% among HIV-positive participants, the percentage knowing their partner(s)’ HIV status increased from 18.7% to 34.3% of HIV-negative and from 14.3% to 35.7% of HIV-positive participants. Among those reporting risky sex at baseline, HIV-positive participants were more likely to eliminate risky sex in general and specifically to become abstinent at follow-up than were HIV-negative participants. Similarly, unmarried participants who were risky at baseline were more likely to become safe in general, become abstinent, and start 100% condom use than were married=cohabitating participants. Rates of disclosure were high. Over 85% of those who tested HIV positive enrolled in care. Routine HIV testing in this setting may promote earlier HIV diagnosis and access to care but leads to only modest reductions in risky sexual behavior. To fully realize the potential HIV prevention benefits of routine HIV testing an emphasis on tailored risk-reduction counseling may be necessary.