Browsing by Author "Nakazibwe, Bridget"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    One Dollar Incentive Improves Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes in Programmatic Settings in Rural Uganda
    (Scientific Reports, 2021) Baluku, Joseph Baruch; Nakazibwe, Bridget; Twinomugisha, Bright; Najjuuko, Rebecca; Isabella, Nyirazihawe; Nassozi, Sylvia; Namiiro, Sharon; Katagira, Winceslaus; Byonanebye, Dathan Mirembe; Sekaggya‑Wiltshire, Christine; Muchiri, Joseph; Ndungu, Elizabeth; Anguzu, Godwin; Mayanja‑Kizza, Harriet; Andia‑Biraro, Irene
    The study aim was to determine the association of a one United States dollar (USD) dollar incentive and tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcomes among people with TB receiving treatment at a rural hospital in Uganda under programmatic settings. We conducted a quasi-experiment in which people with TB were randomised (1:1 ratio) to receive either a one USD incentive at months 0, 2, 5 and 6 (Dollar arm) or routine care (Routine arm). A second control group (Retrospective controls) consisted of participants who had a treatment outcome in the preceding 6 months. Treatment outcomes were compared between the intervention and control groups using Pearson’s chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. The association between the incentive and treatment outcomes was determined using Poisson regression analysis with robust variances. Between November 2018 and October 2019, we enrolled 180 participants (60 in the Dollar arm and 120 in the Control group). TB cure (33.3% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.068) and treatment success (70.0% vs. 59.2% p = 0.156) were higher in the Dollar arm than the Control group, while loss-to-follow-up was lower in the Dollar arm (10.0% vs. 20.8% p = 0.070). Participants in the Dollar arm were more likely to be cured (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR): 1.59, 95% CI 1.04–2.44, p = 0.032) and less likely to be lost to follow-up (aIRR: 0.44, 95% CI 0.20–0.96, p = 0.040). A one-dollar incentive was associated with higher TB cure and lower loss-to-follow-up among people with TB in rural Uganda.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    One dollar incentive improves tuberculosis treatment outcomes in programmatic settings in rural Uganda
    (Scientific Reports, 2021) Baluku, Joseph Baruch; Nakazibwe, Bridget; Twinomugisha, Bright; Najjuuko, Rebecca; Nyirazihawe, Isabella; Nassozi, Sylvia; Namiiro, Sharon; Katagira, Winceslaus; Byonanebye, Dathan Mirembe; Sekaggya-Wiltshire, Christine; Muchiri, Joseph; Ndungu, Elizabeth; Anguzu, Godwin; Mayanja-Kizza, Harriet; Andia-Biraro, Irene
    The study aim was to determine the association of a one United States dollar (USD) dollar incentive and tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcomes among people with TB receiving treatment at a rural hospital in Uganda under programmatic settings. We conducted a quasi-experiment in which people with TB were randomised (1:1 ratio) to receive either a one USD incentive at months 0, 2, 5 and 6 (Dollar arm) or routine care (Routine arm). A second control group (Retrospective controls) consisted of participants who had a treatment outcome in the preceding 6 months. Treatment outcomes were compared between the intervention and control groups using Pearson’s chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. The association between the incentive and treatment outcomes was determined using Poisson regression analysis with robust variances. Between November 2018 and October 2019, we enrolled 180 participants (60 in the Dollar arm and 120 in the Control group). TB cure (33.3% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.068) and treatment success (70.0% vs. 59.2% p = 0.156) were higher in the Dollar arm than the Control group, while loss-to-follow-up was lower in the Dollar arm (10.0% vs. 20.8% p = 0.070). Participants in the Dollar arm were more likely to be cured (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR): 1.59, 95% CI 1.04–2.44, p = 0.032) and less likely to be lost to follow-up (aIRR: 0.44, 95% CI 0.20–0.96, p = 0.040). A one-dollar incentive was associated with higher TB cure and lower loss-to-follow-up among people with TB in rural Uganda.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Prevalence of Intestinal Helminth Coinfection in Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Uganda
    (Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2022) Baluku, Joseph Baruch; Nakazibwe, Bridget; Wasswa, Amir; Naloka, Joshua; Ntambi, Samuel; Waiswa, Damalie; Okwir, Mark; Nabwana, Martin; Bongomin, Felix; Katuramu, Richard; Nuwagira, Edwin; Ntabadde, Kauthrah; Katongole, Paul; Senyimba, Catherine; Andia-Biraro, Irene
    Although a third of people with tuberculosis (TB) are estimated to be coinfected with helminths, the prevalence is largely unknown among people with drug-resistant TB (DR-TB). We determined the prevalence of helminth coinfection among people with DR-TB in Uganda. In a multicenter, cross-sectional study, eligible Ugandan adults with confirmed DR-TB were consecutively enrolled between July to December 2021 at 4 treatment centers. Sociodemographic data were collected using a questionnaire. Participants underwent anthropometric and blood pressure measurements, and blood samples were evaluated for random blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, nonfasting lipid profile, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, and a complete blood count. Fresh stool samples were evaluated for adult worms, eggs, and larvae using direct microscopy after Kato-Katz concentration techniques. Of 212 participants, 156 (73.6%) were male, 118 (55.7%) had HIV, and 3 (2.8%) had malaria coinfection. The prevalence of intestinal helminth coinfection was 4.7% (10/212) (95% confidence interval, 2.6%–8.6%). The frequency of helminth infections was Ancylostoma duodenale (n = 4), Schistosoma mansoni (n = 2), Enterobius vermicularis (n = 2), Ascaris lumbricoides (n = 1), and Trichuris trichiura (n = 1). The prevalence of helminth coinfection was low among people with DR-TB. More studies are needed to determine the clinical relevance of helminth/DR-TB coinfection.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Treatment outcomes of drug resistant tuberculosis patients with multiple poor prognostic indicators in Uganda: A countrywide 5-year retrospective study
    (Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases, 2021) Baluku, Joseph Baruch; Nakazibwe, Bridget; Naloka, Joshua; Nabwana, Martin; Mwanja, Sarah; Mulwana, Rose; Sempiira, Mike; Nassozi, Sylvia; Babirye, Febronius; Namugenyi, Carol; Ntambi, Samuel; Namiiro, Sharon; Bongomin, Felix; Katuramu, Richard; Andia-Biraro, Irene; Worodria, William
    Comorbid conditions and adverse drug events are associated with poor treatment outcomes among patients with drug resistant tuberculosis (DR – TB). This study aimed at determining the treatment outcomes of DR – TB patients with poor prognostic indicators in Uganda. We reviewed treatment records of DR – TB patients from 16 treatment sites in Uganda. Eligible patients had confirmed DR – TB, a treatment outcome in 2014–2019 and at least one of 15 pre-defined poor prognostic indicators at treatment initiation or during therapy. The pre-defined poor prognostic indicators were HIV co-infection, diabetes, heart failure, malignancy, psychiatric illness/symptoms, severe anaemia, alcohol use, cigarette smoking, low body mass index, elevated creatinine, hepatic dysfunction, hearing loss, resistance to fluoroquinolones and/or second-line aminoglycosides, previous exposure to second-line drugs (SLDs), and pregnancy. Tuberculosis treatment outcomes were treatment success, mortality, loss to follow up, and treatment failure as defined by the World Health Organisation. We used logistic and cox proportional hazards regression analysis to determine predictors of treatment success and mortality, respectively. Of 1122 DR – TB patients, 709 (63.2%) were male and the median (interquartile range, IQR) age was 36.0 (28.0–45.0) years. A total of 925 (82.4%) had ≥2 poor prognostic indicators. Treatment success and mortality occurred among 806 (71.8%) and 207 (18.4%) patients whereas treatment loss-to-follow-up and failure were observed among 96 (8.6%) and 13 (1.2%) patients, respectively. Mild (OR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.39–0.84, p = 0.004), moderate (OR: 0.18, 95% CI 0.12–0.26, p < 0.001) and severe anaemia (OR: 0.09, 95% CI 0.05–0.17, p < 0.001) and previous exposure to SLDs (OR: 0.19, 95% CI 0.08–0.48, p < 0.001) predicted lower odds of treatment success while the number of poor prognostic indicators (HR: 1.62, 95% CI 1.30–2.01, p < 0.001), for every additional poor prognostic indicator) predicted mortality. Among DR – TB patients with multiple poor prognostic indicators, mortality was the most frequent unsuccessful outcomes. Every additional poor prognostic indicator increased the risk of mortality while anaemia and previous exposure to SLDs were associated with lower odds of treatment success. The management of anaemia among DR – TB patients needs to be evaluated by prospective studies. DR – TB programs should also optimise DR – TB treatment the first time it is initiated.