Browsing by Author "Harris, Julie R."
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Comparative epidemiologic analysis of COVID-19 patients during the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Uganda(IJID Regions, 2022) Elayeete, Sarah; Nampeera, Rose; Nsubuga, Edirisa J.; Nansikombi, Hildah T.; Kwesiga, Benon; Kadobera, Daniel; Amanya, Geofrey; Ajambo, Miriam; Mwanje, Wilbrod; Riolexus, Alex A.; Harris, Julie R.Introduction: Uganda was affected by two major waves of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The first wave during late 2020 and the second wave in late April 2021. This study compared epidemiologic characteristics of hospitalized (HP) and non-hospitalized patients (NHP) with COVID-19 during the two waves of COVID-19 in Uganda. Methods: Wave 1 was defined as November–December 2020, and Wave 2 was defined as April–June 2021. In total, 800 patients were included in this study. Medical record data were collected for HP (200 for each wave). Contact information was retrieved for NHP who had polymerase-chain-reaction-confirmed COVID-19 (200 for each wave) from laboratory records; these patients were interviewed by telephone. Findings: A higher proportion of HP were male in Wave 1 compared with Wave 2 (73% vs 54%; P = 0.0001). More HP had severe disease or died in Wave 2 compared with Wave 1 (65% vs 31%; P < 0.0001). NHP in Wave 2 were younger than those in Wave 1, but this difference was not significant (mean age 29 vs 36 years; P = 0.13). HP were significantly older than NHP in Wave 2 (mean age 48 vs 29 years; P < 0.0001), but not Wave 1 (mean age 48 vs 43 years; P = 0.31). Interpretation: Demographic and epidemiologic characteristics of HP and NHP differed between and within Waves 1 and 2 of COVID-19 in Uganda.Item Cutaneous anthrax associated with handling carcasses of animals that died suddenly of unknown cause: Arua District, Uganda, January 2015–August 2017(PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2021) Loy Aceng, Freda; Riolexus Ario, Alex; Alitubeera, Phoebe Hilda; Matinda Neckyon, Mukasa; Kadobera, Daniel; Sekamatte, Musa; Okethwangu, Denis; Bulage, Lilian; Harris, Julie R.; Nguma, Willy; Birungi Ndumu, Deo; Buule, Joshua; Nyakarahuka, Luke; Zhu, Bao-PingAnthrax is a zoonotic disease that can be transmitted to humans from infected animals. During May–June 2017, three persons with probable cutaneous anthrax were reported in Arua District, Uganda; one died. All had recently handled carcasses of livestock that died suddenly and a skin lesion from a deceased person tested positive by PCR for Bacillus anthracis. During July, a bull in the same community died suddenly and the blood sample tested positive by PCR for Bacillus anthracis. The aim of this investigation was to establish the scope of the problem, identify exposures associated with illness, and recommend evidencebased control measures. Methods A probable case was defined as acute onset of a papulo-vesicular skin lesion subsequently forming an eschar in a resident of Arua District during January 2015–August 2017. A confirmed case was a probable case with a skin sample testing positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for B. anthracis. Cases were identified by medical record review and active community search. In a case-control study, exposures between case-patients and frequency- and village-matched asymptomatic controls were compared. Key animal health staff were interviewed to learn about livestock deaths. Results There were 68 case-patients (67 probable, 1 confirmed), and 2 deaths identified. Cases occurred throughout the three-year period, peaking during dry seasons. All cases occurred following sudden livestock deaths in the villages. Case-patients came from two neighboring sub-counties: Rigbo (attack rate (AR) = 21.9/10,000 population) and Rhino Camp (AR = 1.9/ 10,000). Males (AR = 24.9/10,000) were more affected than females (AR = 0.7/10,000). Persons aged 30–39 years (AR = 40.1/10,000 population) were most affected. Among all cases and 136 controls, skinning (ORM-H = 5.0, 95%CI: 2.3–11), butchering (ORM-H = 22, 95%CI: 5.5–89), and carrying the carcass of livestock that died suddenly (ORM-H = 6.9, 95% CI: 3.0–16) were associated with illness. Conclusions Exposure to carcasses of animals that died suddenly was a likely risk factor for cutaneous anthrax in Arua District during 2015–2017. The recommendations are investigation of anthrax burden in livestock, prevention of animal infections through vaccinations, safe disposal of the carcasses, public education on risk factors for infection and prompt treatment of illness following exposure to animals that died suddenly.Item Early cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Uganda: epidemiology and lessons learned from risk-based testing approaches – March-April 2020(Globalization and Health, 2020) Migisha, Richard; Kwesiga, Benon; Mirembe, Bernadette B.; Amanya, Geofrey; Kabwama, Steven N.; Kadobera, Daniel; Bulage, Lilian; Nsereko, Godfrey; Wadunde, Ignatius; Tindyebwa, Tonny; Lubwama, Bernard; Kagirita, Atek A.; Kayiwa, John T.; Lutwama, Julius J.; Boore, Amy L.; Harris, Julie R.; Kyobe Bosa, HenryOn March 13, 2020, Uganda instituted COVID-19 symptom screening at its international airport, isolation and SARS-CoV-2 testing for symptomatic persons, and mandatory 14-day quarantine and testing of persons traveling through or from high-risk countries. On March 21, 2020, Uganda reported its first SARS-CoV-2 infection in a symptomatic traveler from Dubai. By April 12, 2020, 54 cases and 1257 contacts were identified. We describe the epidemiological, clinical, and transmission characteristics of these cases. Methods: A confirmed case was laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection during March 21–April 12, 2020 in a resident of or traveler to Uganda. We reviewed case-person files and interviewed case-persons at isolation centers. We identified infected contacts from contact tracing records. Results: Mean case-person age was 35 (±16) years; 34 (63%) were male. Forty-five (83%) had recently traveled internationally (‘imported cases’), five (9.3%) were known contacts of travelers, and four (7.4%) were community cases. Of the 45 imported cases, only one (2.2%) was symptomatic at entry. Among all case-persons, 29 (54%) were symptomatic at testing and five (9.3%) were pre-symptomatic. Among the 34 (63%) case-persons who were ever symptomatic, all had mild disease: 16 (47%) had fever, 13 (38%) reported headache, and 10 (29%) reported cough. Fifteen (28%) case-persons had underlying conditions, including three persons with HIV. An average of 31 contacts (range, 4–130) were identified per case-person. Five (10%) case-persons, all symptomatic, infected one contact each. Conclusion: The first 54 case-persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection in Uganda primarily comprised incoming air travelers with asymptomatic or mild disease. Disease would likely not have been detected in these persons without the targeted testing interventions implemented in Uganda. Transmission was low among symptomatic persons and nonexistent from asymptomatic persons. Routine, systematic screening of travelers and at-risk persons, and thorough contact tracing will be needed for Uganda to maintain epidemic controlItem Individual and household risk factors for COVID-19 infection among household members of COVID-19 patients in home-based care in western Uganda, 2020(IJID Regions, 2022) Amanya, Geofrey; Elyanu, Peter; Kadobera, Daniel; Riolexus, Alex A.; Harris, Julie R.; Mugisha, RichardTo investigate factors associated with COVID-19 among household members of patients in home-based care (HBC) in western Uganda. Methods: We conducted a case-control and cohort study. Cases were RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 diagnosed 1-30 November 2020 among persons in HBC in Kasese or Kabarole Districts. We compared 78 case-households (≥1 secondary case) to 59 control-households (no secondary cases). The cohort included all case-household members. Data were captured by in-person questionnaire. We regressed to calculate odds and risk ratios. Results: Case-households were larger than control-households (mean 5.8 vs 4.3 members, p<0.0001). Having ≥1 household member per room (aOR=4.5, 95%CI 2.0-9.9) or symptom development (aOR=2.3, 95%CI 1.1-5.0), interaction (aOR=4.6, 95%CI 1.4-14.7) with primary case-patient increased odds of case-household status. Households assessed for suitability for HBC reduced odds of case-household status (aOR=0.4, 95%CI=0.2-0.8). Interacting with primary case-patient (aRR=1.7, 95%CI 1.1-2.8) increased the risk of individual infection among household members. Conclusion: Household and individual factors influence secondary infection risk in HBC. Decisions about HBC should be made with these in mindItem Large outbreak of Jimsonweed (Datura stramonium) poisoning due to consumption of contaminated humanitarian relief food: Uganda, March–April 2019(BMC public health, 2022) Mutebi, Ronald R.; Ario, Alex R.; Nabatanzi, Maureen; Kyamwine, Irene B.; Wibabara, Yvette; Muwereza, Peter; Eurien, Daniel; Kwesiga, Benon; Bulage, Lilian; Kabwama, Steven N.; Kadobera, Daniel; Henderson, Alden; Callahan, John H.; Croley, Timothy R.; Knolhoff, Ann M.; Mangrum, John B.; Handy, Sara M.; McFarland, Melinda A.; Fong Sam, Jennifer L.; Harris, Julie R.; Zhu, Bao‑PingJimsonweed (Datura stramonium) contains toxic alkaloids that cause gastrointestinal and central nervous system symptoms when ingested. This can be lethal at high doses. The plant may grow together with leguminous crops, mixing with them during harvesting. On 13 March 2019, more than 200 case-patients were admitted to multiple health centres for acute gastrointestinal and neurologic symptoms. We investigated to determine the cause and magnitude of the outbreak and recommended evidence-based control and prevention measures. Methods: We defined a suspected case as sudden onset of confusion, dizziness, convulsions, hallucinations, diarrhoea, or vomiting with no other medically plausible explanations in a resident of Napak or Amudat District from 1 March—30 April 2019. We reviewed medical records and canvassed all villages of the eight affected subcounties to identify cases. In a retrospective cohort study conducted in 17 villages that reported the earliest cases, we interviewed 211 residents about dietary history during 11–15 March. We used modified Poisson regression to assess suspected food exposures. Food samples underwent chemical (heavy metals, chemical contaminants, and toxins), proteomic, DNA, and microbiological testing in one national and three international laboratories. Results: We identified 293 suspected cases; five (1.7%) died. Symptoms included confusion (62%), dizziness (38%), diarrhoea (22%), nausea/vomiting (18%), convulsions (12%), and hallucinations (8%). The outbreak started on 12 March, 2–12 h after Batch X of fortified corn-soy blend (CSB +) was distributed. In the retrospective cohort study, 66% of 134 persons who ate CSB + , compared with 2.2% of 75 who did not developed illness ( RRadj = 22, 95% CI = 6.0–81). Samples of Batch X distributed 11–15 March contained 14 tropane alkaloids, including atropine (25-50 ppm) and scopolamine (1-10 ppm). Proteins of Solanaceae seeds and Jimsonweed DNA were identified. No other significant laboratory findings were observed. Conclusion: This was the largest documented outbreak caused by food contamination with tropane alkaloids. Implicated food was immediately withdrawn. Routine food safety and quality checks could prevent future outbreaks.Item Risk perception and psychological state of healthcare workers in referral hospitals during the early phase of the COVID‑19 pandemic, Uganda(BMC psychology, 2021) Migisha, Richard; Riolexus, Alex A.; Kwesiga, Benon; Bulage, Lilian; Kadobera, Daniel; Kabwama, Steven N.; Katana, Elizabeth; Ndyabakira, Alex; Wadunde, Ignatius; Byaruhanga, Aggrey; Amanya, Geofrey; Harris, Julie R.; Fitzmaurice, Arthur G.Safeguarding the psychological well-being of healthcare workers (HCWs) is crucial to ensuring sustainability and quality of healthcare services. During the COVID-19 pandemic, HCWs may be subject to excessive mental stress. We assessed the risk perception and immediate psychological state of HCWs early in the pandemic in referral hospitals involved in the management of COVID-19 patients in Uganda. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in five referral hospitals from April 20–May 22, 2020. During this time, we distributed paper-based, self-administered questionnaires to all consenting HCWs on day shifts. The questionnaire included questions on socio-demographics, occupational behaviors, potential perceived risks, and psychological distress. We assessed risk perception towards COVID-19 using 27 concern statements with a four-point Likert scale. We defined psychological distress as a total score > 12 from the 12-item Goldberg’s General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). We used modified Poisson regression to identify factors associated with psychological distress. Results: Among 335 HCWs who received questionnaires, 328 (98%) responded. Respondents’ mean age was 36 (range 18–59) years; 172 (52%) were male. The median duration of professional experience was eight (range 1–35) years; 208 (63%) worked more than 40 h per week; 116 (35%) were nurses, 52 (14%) doctors, 30 (9%) clinical officers, and 86 (26%) support staff. One hundred and forty-four (44%) had a GHQ-12 score > 12. The most common concerns reported included fear of infection at the workplace (81%), stigma from colleagues (79%), lack of workplace support (63%), and inadequate availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) (56%). In multivariable analysis, moderate (adjusted prevalence ratio, [aPR] = 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–4.0) and high (aPR = 3.8, 95% CI 2.0–7.0) risk perception towards COVID-19 (compared with low-risk perception) were associated with psychological distress. Conclusions: Forty-four percent of HCWs surveyed in hospitals treating COVID-19 patients during the early COVID- 19 epidemic in Uganda reported psychological distress related to fear of infection, stigma, and inadequate PPE. Higher perceived personal risk towards COVID-19 was associated with increased psychological distress. To optimizeItem Sporadic outbreaks of crimean-congo haemorrhagic fever in Uganda, July 2018- January 2019(PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019) Mirembe, Bernadette Basuta; Musewa, Angella; Kadobera, Daniel; Kisaakye, Esther; Birungi, Doreen; Eurien, Daniel; Nyakarahuka, Luke; Balinandi, Stephen; Tumusiime, Alex; Kyondo, Jackson; Mbula Mulei, Sophia; Baluku, Jimmy; Kwesiga, Benon; Ndugwa Kabwama, Steven; Zhu, Bao-Ping; Harris, Julie R.; Lutwama, Julius Julian; Alex, Riolexus ArioCrimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a tick-borne, zoonotic viral disease that causes haemorrhagic symptoms. Despite having eight confirmed outbreaks between 2013 and 2017, all within Uganda’s ‘cattle corridor’, no targeted tick control programs exist in Uganda to prevent disease. During a seven-month-period from July 2018-January 2019, the Ministry of Health confirmed multiple independent CCHF outbreaks. We investigated to identify risk factors and recommend interventions to prevent future outbreaks. We defined a confirmed case as sudden onset of fever (�37.5 ̊C) with �4 of the following signs and symptoms: anorexia, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, abdominal pain, joint pain, or sudden unexplained bleeding in a resident of the affected districts who tested positive for Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFv) by RT-PCR from 1 July 2018–30 January 2019. We reviewed medical records and performed active case-finding. We conducted a case-control study and compared exposures of case-patients with age-, sex-, and sub-county-matched control-persons (1:4). We identified 14 confirmed cases (64% males) with five deaths (case-fatality rate: 36%) from 11 districts in the western and central region. Of these, eight (73%) case patients resided in Uganda’s ‘cattle corridor’. One outbreak involved two case-patients and the remainder involved one. All case-patients had fever and 93% had unexplained bleeding. Case-patients were aged 6–36 years, with persons aged 20–44 years more affected (AR: 7.2/1,000,000) than persons �19 years (2.0/1,000,000), p = 0.015. Most (93%) case-patients had contact with livestock �2 weeks before symptom onset. Twelve (86%) lived <1 km from grazing fields compared with 27 (48%) controls (OR M-H = 18, 95% CI = 3.2-1) and 10 (71%) of 14 case-patients found ticks attached to their bodies �2 weeks before symptom onset, compared to 15 (27%) of 56 control-persons (OR M-H = 9.3, 95%CI = 1.9–46). CCHF outbreaks occurred sporadically during 2018–2019, both within and outside the ‘cattle corridor’ districts of Uganda. Most cases were associated with tick exposure. The Ministry of Health should partner with the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry, and Fisheries to develop joint nationwide tick control programs and strategies with shared responsibilities through a One Health approach.