Browsing by Author "Gualtieri, Alex"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Barriers to Biomedical Care for People with Epilepsy in Uganda: A Crosssectional Study
    (Epilepsy & Behavior, 2021) Kaddumukasa, Martin N.; Kaddumukasa, Mark; Kajumba, Mayanja; Smith, Patrick J.; Bobholz, Samuel; Mwesige, Angelina Kakooza; Sinha, Drishti D.; Almojuela, Alysa; Chakraborty, Payal; Nakasujja, Noeline; Nakku, Juliet; Gualtieri, Alex; Onuoha, Erica; Kolls, Brad J.; Muhumuza, Christine; Smith, Caleigh E.; Sanchez, Nadine; Fuller, Anthony T.; Haglund, Michael M.; Koltai, Deborah C.
    Epilepsy, a neurological disorder with effective biomedical treatment, remains largely untreated in Uganda. Potential reasons for this treatment gap (TG) include limited access to trained providers and clinics, social stigmata of seizures, cultural beliefs, or lack of public understanding of epilepsy as a treatable condition. The current study aimed to formally evaluate barriers faced by people with epilepsy (PWE) in Uganda when seeking biomedical care.In a cross-sectional study, 435 participants drawn from a community prevalence study were enrolled. We included participants reporting a history of recurrent seizures suggestive of epilepsy, who completed a survey about barriers to obtaining care for their symptoms. Principal axis factor analysis (PFA) using a promax rotation was conducted for data reduction. Frequencies of barrier factors were compared across those who did not seek care for epilepsy (n = 228), those who sought care from biomedical facilities (n = 166), and those who sought care from a traditional or pastoral healer (n = 41).The PFA yielded a five-factor solution: 1) logistical and actual costs; 2) treatment effectiveness; 3) influence of the opinion of others; 4) doctors' care; and 5) contextual factors impacting decision-making. Variables related to logistical and actual costs were most endorsed. Comparison of groups by care sought did not reveal a difference in endorsement of factors, with the exception that those who sought biomedical care were more likely to endorse factors related to doctors' care compared with those that sought care from traditional or pastoral healers (P = .005).People with repetitive seizures in Uganda report several barriers to obtaining biomedical care in Uganda, with those related to practical and actual costs endorsed the most. It is imperative that interventions developed to reduce the TG in Uganda consider these practical issues to improve access to effective epilepsy care.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Pluralistic and Singular Causal Attributions for Epilepsy in Uganda
    (Epilepsy & Behavior, 2021) Smith, Caleigh E.; Kajumba, Mayanja; Bobholz, Samuel; Smith, Patrick J.; Kaddumukasa, Mark; Mwesige, Angelina Kakooza; Chakraborty, Payal; Sinha, Drishti D.; Kaddumukasa, Martin N.; Gualtieri, Alex; Nakasujja, Noeline; Onuoha, Erica; Nakku, Juliet; Muhumuza, Christine; Sanchez, Nadine; Fuller, Anthony T.; Haglund, Michael M.; Koltai, Deborah C.
    In Uganda, causal attributions for epilepsy reflect a variety of beliefs and impact care-seeking behavior, perpetuate stigma, and undermine the effectiveness of interventions to narrow the epilepsy treatment gap. The objective of this study was to characterize beliefs about seizure etiology to gain a better understanding of how epilepsy is conceptualized in the community in order to inform culturally appropriate educational policies and interventions.In a community-based study, 15,383 participants were surveyed about beliefs related to 15 potential causes for epilepsy. Principal axis factor analysis (PFA) was performed to identify causative factors and then utilized to classify singular versus pluralistic belief systems related to epilepsy etiology. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Mann–Whitney U-tests were conducted to examine the differences in background characteristics across the etiology belief groups.Three main causative factors emerged from the PFA: biological, sociospiritual, and biospiritual. Among those endorsing at least one factor (n = 13,036), the biological factor was endorsed most frequently as a potential cause for epilepsy (88.0%), followed by the sociospiritual (63.4%), then biospiritual (47.6%). Review of the patterns of endorsement found that only 22.2% endorsed the biological factor alone, 6.7% the sociospiritual factor alone, and 2.8% the biospiritual factor alone (total 31.7%). The remainder endorsed a combination of two or all three factors as being potentially causal, and most (65.7%) endorsed a pluralistic combination inclusive of a biological etiology. Group comparisons showed that endorsing only the biological factor was associated with the highest levels of education (p < 0.01), the pluralistic group had the highest ratio of people in the household who needed assistance to those that could provide aid (p < 0.01), and there were significant differences in income across specific groups (p < 0.01).Pluralistic attributions for epilepsy are common in Uganda, with the majority of community members drawing from biomedical and traditional concepts to construct complex explanations for seizures that transcend discrete belief categories traditionally depicted in the literature. These findings emphasize the need to understand cultural beliefs about epilepsy in order to design contextually specific interventions and education programs, which respect the fundamental beliefs and values of the community. This article is part of the Special Issue “The Intersection of Culture, Resources, and Disease: Epilepsy Care in Uganda"