Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All of NRU
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Grint, Daniel"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    High-Dose Oral and Intravenous Rifampicin for the Treatment of Tuberculous Meningitis in Predominantly Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Positive Ugandan Adults: A Phase II Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial
    (Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2021) Cresswell, Fiona V.; Meya, David B.; Kagimu, Enock; Grint, Daniel; Brake, Lindsey te; Kasibante, John; Martyn, Emily; Rutakingirwa, Morris; Quinn, Carson M.; Okirwoth, Micheal; Tugume, Lillian; Ssembambulidde, Kenneth; Musubire, Abdu K.; Bangdiwala, Ananta S.; Buzibye, Allan; Muzoora, Conrad; Svensson, Elin M.; Aarnoutse, Rob; Boulware, David R.; Elliott, Alison M.
    High-dose rifampicin may improve outcomes of tuberculous meningitis (TBM). Little safety or pharmacokinetic (PK) data exist on high-dose rifampicin in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection, and no cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) PK data exist from Africa. We hypothesized that high-dose rifampicin would increase serum and CSF concentrations without excess toxicity. Methods. In this phase II open-label trial, Ugandan adults with suspected TBM were randomized to standard-of-care control (PO-10, rifampicin 10 mg/kg/day), intravenous rifampicin (IV-20, 20 mg/kg/day), or high-dose oral rifampicin (PO-35, 35 mg/kg/ day). We performed PK sampling on days 2 and 14. The primary outcomes were total exposure (AUC0–24), maximum concentration (Cmax), CSF concentration, and grade 3–5 adverse events. Results. We enrolled 61 adults, 92% were living with HIV, median CD4 count was 50 cells/μL (interquartile range [IQR] 46–56). On day 2, geometric mean plasma AUC0–24hr was 42.9·h mg/L with standard-of-care 10 mg/kg dosing, 249·h mg/L for IV-20 and 327·h mg/L for PO-35 (P < .001). In CSF, standard of care achieved undetectable rifampicin concentration in 56% of participants and geometric mean AUC0–24hr 0.27 mg/L, compared with 1.74 mg/L (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–2.5) for IV-20 and 2.17 mg/L (1.6–2.9) for PO-35 regimens (P < .001). Achieving CSF concentrations above rifampicin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) occurred in 11% (2/18) of standard-of-care, 93% (14/15) of IV-20, and 95% (18/19) of PO-35 participants. Higher serum and CSF levels were sustained at day 14. Adverse events did not differ by dose (P = .34). Conclusions. Current international guidelines result in sub-therapeutic CSF rifampicin concentration for 89% of Ugandan TBM patients. High-dose intravenous and oral rifampicin were safe and respectively resulted in exposures ~6- and ~8-fold higher than standard of care, and CSF levels above the MIC.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for the Diagnosis of HIV-associated Tuberculous Meningitis: A Prospective Validation Study
    (The Lancet infectious diseases, 2020) Cresswell, Fiona V.; Tugume, Lillian; Kwizera, Richard; Bangdiwala, Ananta S.; Musubire, Abdu K.; Rutakingirwa, Morris; Kagimu, Enock; Nuwagira, Edwin; Mpoza, Edward; Rhein, Joshua; Williams, Darlisha A.; Muzoora, Conrad; Grint, Daniel; Elliott, Alison M.; Meya, David B.; Boulware, David R.; on behalf of the ASTRO-CM team
    Tuberculous meningitis accounts for 1–5% of tuberculosis cases. Diagnostic delay contributes to poor outcomes. We evaluated the performance of the new Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) for tuberculous meningitis diagnosis. In this prospective validation study, we tested the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of adults presenting with suspected meningitis (ie, headache or altered mental status with clinical signs of meningism) to the Mulago National Referral Hospital and Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital in Uganda. We centrifuged the CSF, resuspended the cell pellet in 2 mL CSF, and tested 0·5 mL aliquots with Xpert Ultra, Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert), and mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) culture. We quantified diagnostic performance against the uniform case definition of probable or definite tuberculous meningitis and a composite microbiological reference standard. From Nov 25, 2016, to Jan 24, 2019, we screened 466 adults with suspected meningitis and tested 204 for tuberculous meningitis. Uniform clinical case definition classified 51 participants as having probable or definite tuberculous meningitis. Against this uniform case definition, Xpert Ultra had 76·5% sensitivity (95% CI 62·5–87·2; 39 of 51 patients) and a negative predictive value of 92·7% (87·6–96·2; 153 of 165), compared with 55·6% sensitivity (44·0–70·4; 25 of 45; p=0·0010) and a negative predictive value of 85·8% (78·9–91·1; 121 of 141) for Xpert and 61·4% sensitivity (45·5–75·6; 27 of 44; p=0·020) and negative predictive value of 85·2% (77·4–91·1; 98 of 115) for MGIT culture. Against the composite microbiological reference standard, Xpert Ultra had sensitivity of 92·9% (80·5–98·5; 39 of 42), higher than Xpert at 65·8% (48·6–80·4; 25 of 38; p=0·0063) and MGIT culture at 72·2% (55·9–86·2; 27 of 37; p=0·092). Xpert Ultra detected nine tuberculous meningitis cases missed by Xpert and MGIT culture. Xpert Ultra detected tuberculous meningitis with higher sensitivity than Xpert and MGIT culture in this HIV-positive population. However, with a negative predictive value of 93%, Xpert Ultra cannot be used as a rule-out test. Clinical judgment and novel highly sensitive point-of-care tests are still required.

Research Dissemination Platform copyright © 2002-2025 NRU

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback