Browsing by Author "Byonanebye, Dathan Mirembe"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Absolute eosinophil count correlates with temperature and CD4 count independently of HIV infection among tuberculosis patients
    (Tropical Medicine & International Health, 2020) Baluku, Joseph Baruch; Anguzu, Godwin Tukumbo; Bongomin, Felix; Byonanebye, Dathan Mirembe
    To determine clinical correlates of the peripheral absolute eosinophil count (AEC) among bacteriologically confirmed TB patients in Uganda. We evaluated data of bacteriologically confirmed adult TB patients who had a peripheral blood AEC measurement at the National TB Treatment Center in Uganda during a cross-sectional study. We performed linear regression analysis for correlates of log-transformed AEC. We included 235 patients in this analysis with a median (interquartile range, IQR) age of 31 (24–39) years. 60.4% were male, and 33.6% had TB/HIV co-infection. In a multivariable linear regression model that controlled for age, residence type, HIV status, weight loss, anorexia, body mass index, CD8+ T-cell count, haemoglobin level and TB bacillary load, males had a 47.0% higher AEC than females (adjusted coefficient (R2) = 0.385, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.012–0.759 P = 0.043). Also, a 1 °C raise in temperature resulted in an 11.5% decrease in the AEC (R2 = −0.122 95% CI (−0.233 to −0.011) P = 0.031) while a 1 cell/mm3 increase in the CD4+ T-cell count resulted in a 0.10% increase in the AEC (R2 = 0.001 95% CI (0.000–0.001) P = 0.032). The AEC was higher among males than females, consistent with the normal population distribution of AEC among Ugandans. The AEC was weakly but positively correlated with the CD4 count and negatively correlated with temperature.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An Interactive Voice Response Software to Improve the Quality of Life of People Living With HIV in Uganda: Randomized Controlled Trial
    (JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021) Byonanebye, Dathan Mirembe; Nabaggala, Maria S.; Naggirinya, Agnes Bwanika; Lamorde, Mohammed; Oseku, Elizabeth; King, Rachel; Owarwo, Noela; Laker, Eva; Orama, Richard; Castelnuovo, Barbara; Kiragga, Agnes; Ratanshi, Rosalind Parkes
    Following the successful scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART), the focus is now on ensuring good quality of life (QoL) and sustained viral suppression in people living with HIV. The access to mobile technology in the most burdened countries is increasing rapidly, and therefore, mobile health (mHealth) technologies could be leveraged to improve QoL in people living with HIV. However, data on the impact of mHealth tools on the QoL in people living with HIV are limited to the evaluation of SMS text messaging; these are infeasible in high-illiteracy settings.The primary and secondary outcomes were to determine the impact of interactive voice response (IVR) technology on Medical Outcomes Study HIV QoL scores and viral suppression at 12 months, respectively.Within the Call for Life study, ART-experienced and ART-naïve people living with HIV commencing ART were randomized (1:1 ratio) to the control (no IVR support) or intervention arm (daily adherence and pre-appointment reminders, health information tips, and option to report symptoms). The software evaluated was Call for Life Uganda, an IVR technology that is based on the Mobile Technology for Community Health open-source software. Eligibility criteria for participation included access to a phone, fluency in local languages, and provision of consent. The differences in differences (DIDs) were computed, adjusting for baseline HIV RNA and CD4.Overall, 600 participants (413 female, 68.8%) were enrolled and followed-up for 12 months. In the intervention arm of 300 participants, 298 (99.3%) opted for IVR and 2 (0.7%) chose SMS text messaging as the mode of receiving reminders and health tips. At 12 months, there was no overall difference in the QoL between the intervention and control arms (DID=0.0; P=.99) or HIV RNA (DID=0.01; P=.94). At 12 months, 124 of the 256 (48.4%) active participants had picked up at least 50% of the calls. In the active intervention participants, high users (received >75% of reminders) had overall higher QoL compared to low users (received <25% of reminders) (92.2 versus 87.8, P=.02). Similarly, high users also had higher QoL scores in the mental health domain (93.1 versus 86.8, P=.008) and better appointment keeping. Similarly, participants with moderate use (51%-75%) had better viral suppression at 12 months (80/94, 85% versus 11/19, 58%, P=.006).Overall, there was high uptake and acceptability of the IVR tool. While we found no overall difference in the QoL and viral suppression between study arms, people living with HIV with higher usage of the tool showed greater improvements in QoL, viral suppression, and appointment keeping. With the declining resources available to HIV programs and the increasing number of people living with HIV accessing ART, IVR technology could be used to support patient care. The tool may be helpful in situations where physical consultations are infeasible, including the current COVID epidemic.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    One Dollar Incentive Improves Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes in Programmatic Settings in Rural Uganda
    (Scientific Reports, 2021) Baluku, Joseph Baruch; Nakazibwe, Bridget; Twinomugisha, Bright; Najjuuko, Rebecca; Isabella, Nyirazihawe; Nassozi, Sylvia; Namiiro, Sharon; Katagira, Winceslaus; Byonanebye, Dathan Mirembe; Sekaggya‑Wiltshire, Christine; Muchiri, Joseph; Ndungu, Elizabeth; Anguzu, Godwin; Mayanja‑Kizza, Harriet; Andia‑Biraro, Irene
    The study aim was to determine the association of a one United States dollar (USD) dollar incentive and tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcomes among people with TB receiving treatment at a rural hospital in Uganda under programmatic settings. We conducted a quasi-experiment in which people with TB were randomised (1:1 ratio) to receive either a one USD incentive at months 0, 2, 5 and 6 (Dollar arm) or routine care (Routine arm). A second control group (Retrospective controls) consisted of participants who had a treatment outcome in the preceding 6 months. Treatment outcomes were compared between the intervention and control groups using Pearson’s chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. The association between the incentive and treatment outcomes was determined using Poisson regression analysis with robust variances. Between November 2018 and October 2019, we enrolled 180 participants (60 in the Dollar arm and 120 in the Control group). TB cure (33.3% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.068) and treatment success (70.0% vs. 59.2% p = 0.156) were higher in the Dollar arm than the Control group, while loss-to-follow-up was lower in the Dollar arm (10.0% vs. 20.8% p = 0.070). Participants in the Dollar arm were more likely to be cured (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR): 1.59, 95% CI 1.04–2.44, p = 0.032) and less likely to be lost to follow-up (aIRR: 0.44, 95% CI 0.20–0.96, p = 0.040). A one-dollar incentive was associated with higher TB cure and lower loss-to-follow-up among people with TB in rural Uganda.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    One dollar incentive improves tuberculosis treatment outcomes in programmatic settings in rural Uganda
    (Scientific Reports, 2021) Baluku, Joseph Baruch; Nakazibwe, Bridget; Twinomugisha, Bright; Najjuuko, Rebecca; Nyirazihawe, Isabella; Nassozi, Sylvia; Namiiro, Sharon; Katagira, Winceslaus; Byonanebye, Dathan Mirembe; Sekaggya-Wiltshire, Christine; Muchiri, Joseph; Ndungu, Elizabeth; Anguzu, Godwin; Mayanja-Kizza, Harriet; Andia-Biraro, Irene
    The study aim was to determine the association of a one United States dollar (USD) dollar incentive and tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcomes among people with TB receiving treatment at a rural hospital in Uganda under programmatic settings. We conducted a quasi-experiment in which people with TB were randomised (1:1 ratio) to receive either a one USD incentive at months 0, 2, 5 and 6 (Dollar arm) or routine care (Routine arm). A second control group (Retrospective controls) consisted of participants who had a treatment outcome in the preceding 6 months. Treatment outcomes were compared between the intervention and control groups using Pearson’s chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. The association between the incentive and treatment outcomes was determined using Poisson regression analysis with robust variances. Between November 2018 and October 2019, we enrolled 180 participants (60 in the Dollar arm and 120 in the Control group). TB cure (33.3% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.068) and treatment success (70.0% vs. 59.2% p = 0.156) were higher in the Dollar arm than the Control group, while loss-to-follow-up was lower in the Dollar arm (10.0% vs. 20.8% p = 0.070). Participants in the Dollar arm were more likely to be cured (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR): 1.59, 95% CI 1.04–2.44, p = 0.032) and less likely to be lost to follow-up (aIRR: 0.44, 95% CI 0.20–0.96, p = 0.040). A one-dollar incentive was associated with higher TB cure and lower loss-to-follow-up among people with TB in rural Uganda.