• Login
    View Item 
    •   NRU
    • Journal Publications
    • Medical and Health Sciences
    • Medical and Health Sciences
    • View Item
    •   NRU
    • Journal Publications
    • Medical and Health Sciences
    • Medical and Health Sciences
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Research, evidence and policymaking: the perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in Uganda

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Article (697.8Kb)
    Date
    2012
    Author
    Nabyonga Orem, Juliet
    Mafigiri, David K.
    Marchal, Bruno
    Ssengooba, Freddie
    Macq, Jean
    Criel, Bart
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Use of evidence in health policymaking plays an important role, especially in resource-constrained settings where informed decisions on resource allocation are paramount. Several knowledge translation (KT) models have been developed, but few have been applied to health policymaking in low income countries. If KT models are expected to explain evidence uptake and implementation, or lack of it, they must be contextualized and take into account the specificity of low income countries for example, the strong influence of donors. The main objective of this research is to elaborate a Middle Range Theory (MRT) of KT in Uganda that can also serve as a reference for other low- and middle income countries. Methods: This two-step study employed qualitative approaches to examine the principal barriers and facilitating factors to KT. Step 1 involved a literature review and identification of common themes. The results informed the development of the initial MRT, which details the facilitating factors and barriers to KT at the different stages of research and policy development. In Step 2, these were further refined through key informant interviews with policymakers and researchers in Uganda. Deductive content and thematic analysis was carried out to assess the degree of convergence with the elements of the initial MRT and to identify other emerging issues. Results: Review of the literature revealed that the most common emerging facilitating factors could be grouped under institutional strengthening for KT, research characteristics, dissemination, partnerships and political context. The analysis of interviews, however, showed that policymakers and researchers ranked institutional strengthening for KT, research characteristics and partnerships as the most important. New factors emphasized by respondents were the use of mainstreamed structures within MoH to coordinate and disseminate research, the separation of roles between researchers and policymakers, and the role of the community and civil society in KT.
    URI
    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-2458-12-109
    https://nru.uncst.go.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/2762
    Collections
    • Medical and Health Sciences [2962]

    Research Dissemination Platform copyright © since 2021  UNCST
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Partners
     

     

    Browse

    All of NRU
    Communities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    This Collection
    By Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Research Dissemination Platform copyright © since 2021  UNCST
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Partners