Koops, KathelijneAkankwasa, WalterCamara, Henry DidierFitzgerald, MaeganKeir, AlexMamy, GnanMatsuzawa, TetsuroPéter, HellaVicent, KizzaZuberbühler, KlausHobaiter, Catherine2024-04-032024-04-032024-04Koops, Kathelijne, Walter Akankwasa, Henry Didier Camara, et al. 'Flexible Grouping Patterns in a Western and Eastern Chimpanzee Community', American Journal of Primatology, vol. 86/no. 4, (2024), pp. e23593-n/a.ISSN 0275-2565EISSN 1098-2345https://nru.uncst.go.ug/handle/123456789/9466Abstract Primate social organizations, or grouping patterns, vary significantly across species. Behavioral strategies that allow for flexibility in grouping patterns offer a means to reduce the costs of group living. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) have a fission‐fusion social system in which temporary subgroups (“parties”) change in composition because of local socio‐ecological conditions. Notably, western chimpanzees (P. t. verus) are described as showing a higher degree of bisexual bonding and association than eastern chimpanzees, and eastern female chimpanzees (P. t. schweinfurthii) are thought to be more solitary than western female chimpanzees. However, reported comparisons in sociality currently depend on a small number of study groups, particularly in western chimpanzees, and variation in methods. The inclusion of additional communities and direct comparison using the same methods are essential to assess whether reported subspecies differences in sociality hold in this behaviorally heterogeneous species. We explored whether sociality differs between two communities of chimpanzees using the same motion‐triggered camera technology and definitions of social measures. We compare party size and composition (party type, sex ratio) between the western Gahtoy community in the Nimba Mountains (Guinea) and the eastern Waibira community in the Budongo Forest (Uganda). Once potential competition for resources such as food and mating opportunities were controlled for, subspecies did not substantially influence the number of individuals in a party. We found a higher sex‐ratio, indicating more males in a party, in Waibira; this pattern was driven by a greater likelihood in Gahtoy to be in all‐female parties. This finding is the opposite of what was expected for eastern chimpanzees, where female‐only parties are predicted to be more common. Our results highlight the flexibility in chimpanzee sociality, and caution against subspecies level generalizations. We used the same motion‐triggered camera technology to compare party size and composition between the western Gahtoy community in the Nimba Mountains (Guinea) and the eastern Waibira community in the Budongo Forest (Uganda). Western chimpanzees were more likely to be in all‐female parties, which is contrary to the expectation of more female‐only parties in eastern chimpanzees. Our findings highlight the flexibility in chimpanzee grouping patterns. Research highlights Party size in western and eastern chimpanzees did not differ between our two study communities suggesting that the number of individuals in a party is shaped by similar socio‐ecological pressures. In our sample, eastern chimpanzees were found to have more males in a party compared to western chimpanzees, contrary to the expectation of more female‐only parties in eastern compared to western chimpanzees. Our findings highlight the flexibility in chimpanzee grouping patterns and caution against subspecies level generalizations from limited data points and/or heterogeneous methods.encamera trapping, chimpanzee, party composition, party size, socialityArticle