Nakayama, Luis FilipeMatos, JoãoQuion, JustinNovaes, FredericoMitchell, William GreigMwavu, RogersHung, Claudia Ju-Yi JiSantiago, Alvina Pauline DyPhanphruk, WarachayaCardoso, Jaime SCeli, Leo Anthony2024-10-142024-10-142024-10-08Nakayama, Luis Filipe, João Matos, Justin Quion, et al. 'Unmasking Biases and Navigating Pitfalls in the Ophthalmic Artificial Intelligence Lifecycle: A Narrative Review', PLOS Digital Health, vol. 3/no. 10, (2024), pp. e0000618.ISSN 2767-3170EISSN 2767-3170https://nru.uncst.go.ug/handle/123456789/9652Over the past 2 decades, exponential growth in data availability, computational power, and newly available modeling techniques has led to an expansion in interest, investment, and research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications. Ophthalmology is one of many fields that seek to benefit from AI given the advent of telemedicine screening programs and the use of ancillary imaging. However, before AI can be widely deployed, further work must be done to avoid the pitfalls within the AI lifecycle. This review article breaks down the AI lifecycle into seven steps—data collection; defining the model task; data preprocessing and labeling; model development; model evaluation and validation; deployment; and finally, post-deployment evaluation, monitoring, and system recalibration—and delves into the risks for harm at each step and strategies for mitigating them.enArticle