Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSsali, Agnes
dc.contributor.authorPoland, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorSeeleya, Janet
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-13T10:26:59Z
dc.date.available2021-12-13T10:26:59Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSsali, A., Poland, F., & Seeley, J. (2020). Experiences of research ethics committee members and scientists of the research protocol review process in Uganda: a case study. International Health, 12(6), 541-542.doi:10.1093/inthealth/ihaa047en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1093/inthealth/ihaa047
dc.identifier.urihttps://nru.uncst.go.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/404
dc.description.abstractWe investigated how relevant and responsive scientists and research ethics committee (REC) members considered the research protocol review processes for health research practice in Uganda. Methods: Interviews were conducted with five scientists and five REC members. Data were analysed thematically. Results: How much to compensate for time, the amount of study information shared with volunteers and sample storage for future unknown research were areas of concern for REC members. Delays in getting feedback concerned scientists. Conclusions: Researchers and REC members need to hold regular discussions to ensure the review process is relevant and responsive.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Healthen_US
dc.subjectethics committeeen_US
dc.subjectprocessen_US
dc.subjectprotocolen_US
dc.subjectresearchen_US
dc.subjectreviewen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.titleExperiences of research ethics committee members and scientists of the research protocol review process in Uganda: a case studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record