Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrabowski, M.K.
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, S.J.
dc.contributor.authorKagaayi, J.
dc.contributor.authorGray, R.H.
dc.contributor.authorClarke, W.
dc.contributor.authorChang, L.C.
dc.contributor.authorNakigozi, G.
dc.contributor.authorLaeyendecker, O.
dc.contributor.authorRedd, A.D.
dc.contributor.authorGoud-Billoux, V.
dc.contributor.authorSsekubugu, R.
dc.contributor.authorNalugoda, F.
dc.contributor.authorWawer, M.J.
dc.contributor.authorSerwadda, D.
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, T.C.
dc.contributor.authorTobian, A.A.R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-09T17:20:56Z
dc.date.available2022-03-09T17:20:56Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationGrabowski, M. K., Reynolds, S. J., Kagaayi, J., Gray, R. H., Clarke, W., Chang, L. C., ... & Tobian, A. A. (2018). The validity of self-reported antiretroviral use in persons living with HIV: a population-based study. AIDS (London, England), 32(3), 363. doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000001706.en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1097/QAD.0000000000001706.
dc.identifier.urihttps://nru.uncst.go.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/2616
dc.description.abstractTo assess the validity of self-reported antiretroviral therapy use (ART) using population-based cohort data. Methods—Self-reported ART use and non-use was compared to a validated laboratory assay in 557 HIV-positive participants in the Rakai Community Cohort Study surveyed between September and December 2011 in Rakai, Uganda. The study population included participants from seven communities, including one fishing community with high HIV prevalence (~41%). ART use was assayed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry which detects 20 antiretroviral (ARV) drugs. HIV viral load measurements were also obtained. Individuals with ≥2 antiretroviral (ARV) drugs detected were considered to be using ART. Results—153 (27%) participants self-reported ART use of whom 148 (97%) had ≥2 ARV drugs detected. There were ≥2 ARV drugs detected in 11% (n=44/404) of individuals with no self-reported ART use. Overall, the specificity of self-reported ART use was 99% (95%CI:97–100%) and the sensitivity was 77% (70–83%). Positive and negative predictive values were 97% (95%CI: 93–99%) and 89% (95%CI: 86–92%), respectively. Non-disclosure of ART use was significantly more common in younger persons (<30 years) and among those in trading occupations, but did not vary by community of residence. Conclusions—Self-reported ART use has high specificity and moderate sensitivity providing reasonable, but conservative estimates of population-based ART use. There is more under- reporting of ART use among younger persons and traders suggesting a need for more research on barriers to self-reporting of ART use in these sub-groups.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAIDSen_US
dc.subjectAIDSen_US
dc.subjectHIVen_US
dc.subjectAntiretroviral therapyen_US
dc.subjectCombination HIV preventionen_US
dc.subjectSelf-reporten_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.subjectSub-Saharan Africaen_US
dc.titleThe validity of self-reported antiretroviral use in persons living with HIV: a population-based studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record